#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one software#
#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one trial#
#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one Pc#
#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one iso#
#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one mac#

Just like you I also look for possibilities to speed up y processing workflow -) Before culling I do the backup anyway and can go back if for example, I find out that the photo is not sharp enough and want to check the others in the same series. So, I need an application which reads photos quickly, the low resolution is OK, I need to delete the doubles or tripples or bad-composition pictures. I know I can run building of previews during the night as well but I would prefer to do it immediatelly. LR and Abode Bridge take their time to read the photos or to build pre-views.

#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one software#

Now I am looking for software which helps me to cull the photos quickly. The power of PureRAW is in a batch processing! Topaz is a very good software but it takes me at least 10minutes per picture to fine-tune, to choose right settings in preview and then it does processing itself and block me from working.

#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one iso#

Yes, PureRAW eliminates almost all noise but sometimes by a very high ISO like 12500 or 10000 something can be still seen. I also have the last version of Topaz DeNoise and use it at the end of processing if there is still a bit of noise. The last version of PureRAW has more features and settings but to be honest I don't even use them. Sometimes I do some changes in LR to see if the photo qualifies to be processed and then run it in a batch PureRAW and after importing in LR the chnages will be re-applied automatically. That means I do denoising before processing. For me is important that it can run in a batch and deliver very good results! You can also do it manually, of course! and let all your computers run some batch -) So, it can work in Workflow as a plugin and independently.

The Pure RAW exported the pictures into the LR Catalog after processing.

#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one mac#

That means that after selecting the best photos I let the PureRAW run the batch (of 100 photos or more) in Mac Mini during the night or during the day time when I can work in Mac Air on the other catalog. The PureRAW is a batch processing program.

#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one Pc#

I expect that LR on Microsoft PC will open my Catalogs as well becasue of NTFS format of the disk and I can take my work 'with me' so to say. It gives me a possibility to work parallel on two catalogs at least becasue I have a Mac Air and Mac Mini. For example, after a big shooting somewhere in national park or in Africa I keep the Africa-trip in a separate catalog with the photos on external hard disk formated as NTFS. I have my LR Catalogs on external drives along with photos classified on years or themes. I have PureRAW fully integrated in my Workflow just in the beginning of processing after the culling of bad pictures. But you can denoise your photos faster in PureRAW becasue it has a batch processing. My partner works with DXO PL and made the tests of de-noising the same photos on both applications. I think, PureRAW and DXO PL have the same engine for de-noising and corrections. I just don't know if it's because of the camera output or LR updates., I use PureRAW a long time already. While I've always had the performance issues, it definitely got worse after going to the r5. I'm not sure how much higher MP contributes to LR lag.

#Dxo photolab 2 vs capture one trial#

Give the free trial a shot! The interface is a little different, though it's sleeker and smoother, but you can edit the interface so pretty much everything is in the same spot as LR.Īnyway, just thought it was worth saying something considering all the LR performance posts I see throughout the weeks.Įdit: I also shoot with the Canon r5. I much prefer working in sessions and from a filesystem.Įither way, just wanted to throw this out there for those of you annoyed with LR and have considered moving to an alternative.

I've not been limited at all with C1, though I'll also admit, I'm not a giant catalog-based user. Spent 30 days on the Trial of Capture One, and the performance difference is like night vs day (Okay, maybe dusk) in comparison to LR.Īs someone running a PC with an i9, 32gb RAM, and a Nvidia 3080 and still dealing with crappy performance in LR, I just couldn't justify staying with them anymore. After MANY YEARS of LR Classic, I finally jumped ship.